![]() |
|
Why army officers in Afghanistan made career limiting moves by Joe Hueglin, Canadian Political Columnist
Canadians have been led to believe matters are improving in Afghanistan. Parliament is in the process of voting that our 2,500 Canadian Forces personnel remain in Kandahar until 2011, subject to their reinforcement by 1 000 troops and six helicopters from our NATO allies. On February 11th it was reported Gen. Gauthier, commander of all Canadian forces overseas, "invited reporters for an unusually open discussion in Kandahar ". They were informed our Forces had withdraw from most of Kandahar Province "to focus on a few central areas." and that "In places just beyond the Canadians' zone of control, the Taliban have established a parallel court system, enforced curfews, and mounted road checkpoints." On February 23, 2008, Major Richard Moffet, Deputy Commander of Canada's battle group suggested that "Canada needs to double its current troop strength of 2,500 to keep the Taliban away from those important areas." and that "Easily you could have a brigade of 5,000 Canadians here just for Zhari, Panjwai, Arghandab, Shah Wali Kot and Khakrez, because to be honest, we haven't been to a few places in Panjwai yet. " In the same article, Colonel Christian Juneau,Deputy Commander, Joint Task Force Afghanistan, (Kandahar Province) is quoted as saying succinctly to elders concerned about Taliban in their outlying district " We don't have enough troops". Both these officers were interviewed in Afghanistan by the Independent Panel on Canada's Future Role In Afghanistan. Probabilities are they told the panelists what they hold to be true. Why otherwise than because Panel and now Parliament have ignored reality as they live it would they go public? What other reason can there be for committing what amounts to professional suicide other than concern for the future of the men and women with them on their Mission? About the writer: Joe Hueglin is a former Member of Parliament and co-founder of the Progressive Canadian Party. You can email him any comments that you have about his political column. LINK
Become a Member: Would you like to see other similar articles and critical commentaries in The Canadian National Newspaper? Then, show your support. Make a member-pledge donation, in support of the Membership Drive of the Pro-Democracy Media Foundation. The Canadian can only continue to publish investigative articles in such areas, with the donations from members of the public in Canada, the U.S., and abroad. Consider making a donation of $50.00, $75.00, $100.00, $200.00 or more. Donors are eligible to receive our first collector's print edition in mail. Alternatively, you can send us a note to be placed on our special email list of members. Member-donors can also suggest articles or commentaries to be published in The Canadian. The Canadian is a socially progressive and not-for-profit national newspaper, with an international readership. We provide an alternative to the for-profit commercial focused media, which often censors vital information and perspective of potential interest to the diverse Canadian public, and other peoples internationally. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2008 Cité Libre. All rights reserved. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Cité Libre is Canada's eclectic and non-for-profit and investigative magazine.